INTERACTIVE COMPARISON TOOL
Screen whether a written pool proposal addresses major scope, responsibility, payment, change, warranty, and closeout categories.
COMPLETENESS SCREEN
0/100 addressedThe written scope leaves many comparison questions unresolved. Convert assumptions into written inclusions, exclusions, or questions.
Educational planning result only. This scores category coverage, not fairness, legal validity, contractor quality, or project safety. It is not legal advice. Consider local legal review before signing a high-value agreement.
This tool checks whether common planning categories appear clearly in the document you are reviewing. It does not decide whether language is fair, enforceable, complete under state law, or suitable for the property. A high score can still sit beside unfavorable terms, unsupported allowances, or missing legal protections.
Mark a category only when the written proposal, contract, drawing, schedule, or incorporated exhibit addresses it clearly. A verbal promise should become a written clarification. If several documents control the project, identify their order of precedence and keep the approved versions together.
The most useful output is the unresolved list. Ask who owns each item, whether it is included, what assumption supports the price, what evidence establishes completion, and how a change is approved. Verify the legal contractor entity, credentials, insurance, permits, payment protections, cancellation rights, deposit rules, and lien requirements with the authorities and advisers that apply locally.
No. It only means the listed categories were marked as addressed.
No. Ask for them to be included in the controlling written documents.
No. Deposit and payment rules vary; verify them for the project jurisdiction.
Use this screen on each document, then use the proposal comparison worksheet.
No. Consider a qualified local attorney for legal review.
CONTINUE THE RESEARCH
Use the project brief and proposal matrix to carry the same assumptions into builder conversations.